ZDaemon Europe Forum Index ZDaemon Europe
Powered by DooM
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The Teams

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ZDaemon Europe Forum Index -> ECDL
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Which version of the teams do you prefer?
A
26%
 26%  [ 4 ]
B
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
C
73%
 73%  [ 11 ]
Total Votes : 15

Author Message
Nero
Arrogance is Bliss


Joined: 14 May 2010
Posts: 37
Location: England

PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 10:52 am    Post subject: The Teams Reply with quote

Of course this is totally interest based but how should we do the teams?

Last time was 6 great captains (Well 5 plus a waste) and they each took their turns to pick a further 3 players into their squad. This was a lot of fun and tense as each captain took their time to wisely pick who'd best fit and work with the team plan.

We could quite easily do this version again (We'll call that A.)... Or we could try some of the following:

A. 6 Captains + 3 Squad Members (Ensures top quality teams with very entertaining matches to be watched)

B. 8 Captains + 3 Squad Members (Requires a lot of interest, and better working of the how the draft will go... Plus more games!)

C. 6 Captains + 4 Squad Members (Will give the newbies a chance to get into a team and prove their worth).


With version C. this could mean we can have some maps requiring 4v4, mixing things up a little and giving the teams more chance to play with atleast 3v3. (Many of last seasons' games were a mere 2v2).

Personally, I am more down for A than the others because I know it'll mean top class teams... Though I am all for C in the way it gives newbies a decent shot and it could also mean a lot more 3vs3's. But would we get the interest to create such vast teams?

Opinions!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Dopefish
Master Exploder


Joined: 13 May 2010
Posts: 10

PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 11:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dude, 8 teams with 3 cannot work ever. Last season draza and darg dropped after first round, master dropped after 2nd, so did sniper, weaponx, capodecima, jackinthebox and hawk iirc. 6 teams with 3 only if the interest really sucks and we cannot get 24. Thus I'm for 6 teams and 4 players
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nero
Arrogance is Bliss


Joined: 14 May 2010
Posts: 37
Location: England

PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 11:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The 3 does not include the captain! Plus we'll have a reserve pool remember Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Dopefish
Master Exploder


Joined: 13 May 2010
Posts: 10

PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 11:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nero wrote:
The 3 does not include the captain! Plus we'll have a reserve pool remember Smile


aha, lol..then I would vote A Cool . From personal experience - even if the team has 5 players, they would rarely get a chance to play Smile

It is about the same as 4 players with reserve pool, just even more strict, which adds more hassle
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
capodecima
Part-time flamer


Joined: 09 May 2010
Posts: 28
Location: Czech Republic

PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 11:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i vote C Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Nero
Arrogance is Bliss


Joined: 14 May 2010
Posts: 37
Location: England

PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 3:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I see C being voted for, I'd love to know why!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
capodecima
Part-time flamer


Joined: 09 May 2010
Posts: 28
Location: Czech Republic

PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 4:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

lol it was unnecessary my message , i vote C becouse idea with 4 members in team like me Smile but i am only for CTF 3 on 3 or 4 on 4 not more , offtopic a bit Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
SwiftShot
Gay marine


Joined: 08 May 2010
Posts: 17
Location: Coventry, Warwickshire, England

PostPosted: Wed May 19, 2010 7:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I voted C because it gives a chance to people to prove themselves who arent classed as the top players (as you said). Sure its great to watch all the best players in europe fighting it out in a clan scene, but imo it would be better for say a team of 4 training another player up aswell. I think people would become more confident by playing with more expirienced players within their team, and I think it would improve them alot.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Master
Newbie


Joined: 09 May 2010
Posts: 8
Location: France

PostPosted: Wed May 19, 2010 7:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dopefish wrote:
Nero wrote:
The 3 does not include the captain! Plus we'll have a reserve pool remember Smile


aha, lol..then I would vote A Cool . From personal experience - even if the team has 5 players, they would rarely get a chance to play Smile

It is about the same as 4 players with reserve pool, just even more strict, which adds more hassle


He has not wrong Dope. Sometimes difficult to get players... It's why I'll vote for A.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Nero
Arrogance is Bliss


Joined: 14 May 2010
Posts: 37
Location: England

PostPosted: Thu May 20, 2010 3:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well right now the votes are tied at 5 each (Dopefish actually prefers A) if it stays this way I'm most likely going to be sticking with the original format. That's not to say the newbies won't get a look in, we'll host some private servers for everyone to practice in and we'll see who shines!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
dew
Newbie


Joined: 18 May 2010
Posts: 6

PostPosted: Thu May 20, 2010 6:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

C, but without 4v4 games, cause they are impossible to organize reliably.
some teams might end up overcrowded with all 5 players online all the time, but others will struggle to get 3 online even with 5 in a lineup, soo... yeah, there's probably going to be more benchwarming time, but it's better than no league time at all, riiight? Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ZDaemon Europe Forum Index -> ECDL All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group. Hosted by phpBB.BizHat.com


Start Your Own Video Sharing Site

Free Web Hosting | Free Forum Hosting | FlashWebHost.com | Image Hosting | Photo Gallery | FreeMarriage.com

Powered by PhpBBweb.com, setup your forum now!
For Support, visit Forums.BizHat.com